NYPD Monitor Stop and Frisk Peter Zimroth Good but we Need a Permanent Outside Monitor
* Peter Zimroth, the 70-year old attorney appointed by a federal judge to oversee reforms of the NYPD’s stop-and-frisk policy, said his position is “narrow in scope” and not a replacement for an inspector general, The Wall Street Journal writes: http://on.wsj.com/13V34AF
My comment posted below on the WSJ:
Anyone who uses the term "Inspector General" does not know what they are talking about.
The Wall St Journal published my letter "Betrayal at Ground Zero' and The NY Times a letter asking for sizeable raise for the NYPD and FDNY after 9-11 and now I have my first lawsuit and in it I tell you CCRB -- that is the civilian complaint review board, IAB that is Internal Affairs Bureau and NYC's Gov Commission to Combat Police Corruption are either inept or corrupt or both.
An NYPD inspector general is not a viable option but another agency "inside NYC gov" that would cost more money generate more paper work and bogus reports and do what they all do including mayor Bloomberg and Ray kelly and that is protect "The NYPD Brand" a term I made up.
http://youtu.be/pefTVn7IgLc
Here is my video response to the good news about Stop and Frisk Trial.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/155408389/Suzannah-B-Troy-v-NYPD-IAB-City-of-New-York-New-York-City-Commissioner-Raymond-Kelly-New-York-Police-Department-NYPD-Internal-Affairs-BureauChi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dh9TedhfthE
Here is the video proving without a doubt I was violently attacked by Dr Andrew Fagelman's receptionist who is also his office manager named Delita Hooks although I dubbed her the Jodi Arais of medical reception desks the NYPD helped get away with everything but murder.
The NYPD met with her but refused to met with me underscoring Delita Hooks irrational verbal assault telling me I have no rights.
The NYPD clearly agreed with her so you will see in my lawsuit I point out the NYPD and in my opinion also IAB violated my 14th amendment rights.
Word on the street is the NYPD are out of control.
Why are spending all this money on video systems like "Domain" and a video system they can wear when the NYPD are fixing crime and in my case ignoring video evidence that proved Delita Hooks filed a false cross complaint. Now the video proves the NYPD also fixed a violent crime which may mean a far more serious 2nd eye surgery to repair my eye. The video goes black from Delita Hooks running punch to my eye.
Delita Hooks not fired or arrested.
I have 2 audio YouTubes one of the First Precinct preventing me from reporting Delita Hooks filed a false cross complaint and the 2nd an IAB Sgt stating "case closed" and I do not understand how an investigator could say that with the video and 10 months and I am still faxing IAB demanding Delita Hooks be arrested.
Judge Mollen requested a permenent outside monitor and it means we need a new mayor to get that outside monitor instead of a bogus Inspector General for some fat cat who is already collecting an NYC gov pension.
I am glad we have Peter Zimroth but we need an outside monitor.
* Peter Zimroth, the 70-year old attorney appointed by a federal judge to oversee reforms of the NYPD’s stop-and-frisk policy, said his position is “narrow in scope” and not a replacement for an inspector general, The Wall Street Journal writes: http://on.wsj.com/13V34AF
My comment posted below on the WSJ:
Anyone who uses the term "Inspector General" does not know what they are talking about.
The Wall St Journal published my letter "Betrayal at Ground Zero' and The NY Times a letter asking for sizeable raise for the NYPD and FDNY after 9-11 and now I have my first lawsuit and in it I tell you CCRB -- that is the civilian complaint review board, IAB that is Internal Affairs Bureau and NYC's Gov Commission to Combat Police Corruption are either inept or corrupt or both.
An NYPD inspector general is not a viable option but another agency "inside NYC gov" that would cost more money generate more paper work and bogus reports and do what they all do including mayor Bloomberg and Ray kelly and that is protect "The NYPD Brand" a term I made up.
http://youtu.be/pefTVn7IgLc
Here is my video response to the good news about Stop and Frisk Trial.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/155408389/Suzannah-B-Troy-v-NYPD-IAB-City-of-New-York-New-York-City-Commissioner-Raymond-Kelly-New-York-Police-Department-NYPD-Internal-Affairs-BureauChi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dh9TedhfthE
Here is the video proving without a doubt I was violently attacked by Dr Andrew Fagelman's receptionist who is also his office manager named Delita Hooks although I dubbed her the Jodi Arais of medical reception desks the NYPD helped get away with everything but murder.
The NYPD met with her but refused to met with me underscoring Delita Hooks irrational verbal assault telling me I have no rights.
The NYPD clearly agreed with her so you will see in my lawsuit I point out the NYPD and in my opinion also IAB violated my 14th amendment rights.
Word on the street is the NYPD are out of control.
Why are spending all this money on video systems like "Domain" and a video system they can wear when the NYPD are fixing crime and in my case ignoring video evidence that proved Delita Hooks filed a false cross complaint. Now the video proves the NYPD also fixed a violent crime which may mean a far more serious 2nd eye surgery to repair my eye. The video goes black from Delita Hooks running punch to my eye.
Delita Hooks not fired or arrested.
I have 2 audio YouTubes one of the First Precinct preventing me from reporting Delita Hooks filed a false cross complaint and the 2nd an IAB Sgt stating "case closed" and I do not understand how an investigator could say that with the video and 10 months and I am still faxing IAB demanding Delita Hooks be arrested.
Judge Mollen requested a permenent outside monitor and it means we need a new mayor to get that outside monitor instead of a bogus Inspector General for some fat cat who is already collecting an NYC gov pension.
I am glad we have Peter Zimroth but we need an outside monitor.
* The Times praises federal Judge Shira Scheindlin for upholding “the bedrock principle of individual liberty” in her ruling against the NYPD’s use of stop-and-frisk and hopes Bloomberg’s successor will drop the appeal to her decision: http://nyti.ms/166Vq5C
* The Times’ Michael Powell criticizes Bloomberg’s lack of nuance in responding to Scheindlin’s stop-and-frisk ruling, while pointing out that legal stop-and-frisks “remain important”: http://nyti.ms/19fn0yS
* In the Post, the Manhattan Institute’s Heather Mac Donald writes that Scheindlin’s ruling is “blind” to the realities of crime and policing in New York City and that it signals the end of living in freedom of fear:http://bit.ly/14GOU62
* The Daily News’ Mike Lupica writes that New York City is the big loser in Scheindlin’s stop-and-frisk ruling, and that the city is safer because of Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Ray Kelly: http://nydn.us/14GSQn6
