I removed x name because I don't want to direct traffic.
Sept. 30, 2012
Corporate Development & Chief Legal Officer
or Current Chief Legal Officer.
Google Inc.
Legal Department
1600 Amphitheater Parkway
Mountain View, California 94043
Dear Chief Legal Officer Google:
IMMEDIATE RESPONSE REQUESTED
I am acting as my own "Citizen Lawyer" although Norman Siegel is my Civil Rights lawyer and in the past I had a consultation with Steve Wagner in the past who famously held Google accountable for the "skank" comment because my AdSense earnings alone would take many years to pay either of these lawyers to write this letter and it is to tell you of a series of abuses involving Google YouTube, Blogger and AdSense.
A Google YouTube partner ////// //////////// has appeared to taken my AdSense account which I gave him when we were briefly blogging partners and I did give him permission to plug my ad sense account in to his // //////// blogspot.com as he had requested but it appears as some form act of retribution perhaps he has taken my ad sense account and plugged it in to his blog (another blog) /////////blogspot without permission and with a title referring to Paris Hilton's Orgasm getting my account suspended but lucky for me solely for his blog which I never earned a penny on.
I contacted ///////// ///////////, a Google YouTube partner as well as //// //////, who /////////// introduced me to via email when we were on friendly terms, //// ///// who wrote an apology when my entire Google YouTube Channel was wrongly removed for 28 hours which we believe for political reasons on behalf of Mike Bloomberg, Christine Quinn and David Yassky, as well as Chris at AdSense who helped me when I couldn't get Ad Sense to pay me at first earnings because Ad Sense claimed they needed more proof I was in fact Suzannah Troy.
Despite all my efforts I was wrongly punished and called out by Ad Sense and I can't help but worry this was some kind of insider mean spirited prank/abuse of power by /////// //////// and an associate at Google but I called //////////, emailed him and posted a comment to cease and desist wrongful use of my Adsense account and I pointed out as a YouTube partner he knew better than to use "Paris Hilton Orgasm" in a header of a blog post. I asked him to change or remove the post.
See //////// /////////// blog post header below where he plugged in my Adsense account without my knowledge or permission which I told AdSense in the appeal option they gave me and AdSense still punished me although I had nothing to do with this post by /////// //////////and I have no access to his blogs to plug in my adsense account which he illegally did because I did not give him permission and why did he do this?
When I worked with /////////// he asked for my AdSense account to plug in to /// //// ///// and I gave it to him strictly with permission to use on only his // /////// blog. /////////// cautioned me to use 5 words in a title only and to be cautious of sexual content when posting on his blog. See below //////// ////////'s post clearly posted by him with his name and his blog yet my AdSense account plugged in without my knowledge and consent.
I am asking for an official apology from Google Ad Sense asap regarding the email below and this injustice done to me.
Google Ad Sense wrongfully accused me of violating terms on a blog that I have no access or relationship with owned and run by ///// ////////////.
See below:
"This email is to alert you that one of your websites is not currently in compliance with our AdSense program policies and as a result, ad serving has been disabled to your website.
Issue ID#:
Ad serving has been disabled to: //////////.blogspot.com
Example page where violation occurred: http://blogspot.com/2012/06/ -female-bodybuilder-upskirt-shows\
Action required: Check all other remaining sites in your account for compliance.
Current account status: Active
Violation explanation
ADULT/SEXUALLY GRATIFYING: As stated in our program policies, AdSense publishers are not permitted to place Google ads on pages with adult or mature content. This includes images or video content containing lewd or provocative poses, or close-ups of breasts, butts, or crotches. More information about this policy can be found in our help center ( https://www.google.com/adsense/support/as/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=105957 ).
Action required: Check account for compliance
While ad serving has been disabled to the above site, your AdSense account remains active. Please be aware that the URL above is just an example and that the same violations may exist on other pages of this website or other sites you own. Therefore, we suggest that you take the time to review the rest of your sites to ensure that they’re in compliance with our policies, and to monitor your sites accordingly to reduce the likelihood of future policy emails from us. Additionally, please note that our team reserves the right to disable accounts at any time if we continue to see violations occurring.
Appeals
If you wish to appeal this disabling then you can do so by using the Issue ID listed above to contact us via our Help Center: https://support.google.com/adsense/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=113061.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
The Google AdSense Team"
I posted this comment on the post of //////// ///////////// where he plugged in my adsense account without my knowledge or permission.
Note to anyone hoping to earn money from Google Adsense -- if a YouTube partner asks to work with you and asks to plug your AdSense in to a blog for you to earn money it maybe in your best interest to say no. Even so when I alerted Google AdSense it was obvious I did not post this "Paris Hilton Orgasm" post Google AdSense punished me and not their partner.
I am also concerned that this false and wrongfully attack on me via Ad Sense could possibly be a form of sexual and political discrimination which is quite worrisome just like the wrongfully adult warning my YouTube.
On Aug 9, 2012, at 2:18 AM, YouTube Service wrote:
help center | e-mail options | report spam Regarding your account:Suzannahartist
The YouTube Community has flagged one or more of your videos as inappropriate. Once a video is flagged, it is reviewed by the YouTube Team against our Community Guidelines. Upon review, we have determined that the following video(s) contain content that may not be suitable for all viewers:
Suzannah B. Troy Only One to Report Denault vs SAIC, Denault Won & More Blacked Out News!
As a result, we have age-restricted this content.
For more information on YouTube's Community Guidelines and how they are enforced, please visit the help center http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?answer=92486.
Sincerely,
The YouTube Team© 2012 YouTube, LLC
901 Cherry Ave, San Bruno, CA 94066
=
SUZANNAH B. TROY ONLY ONE TO REPORT DENAULT VS SAIC, DENAULT WON & MORE BLACKED OUT NEWS!
My belief is a very lonely man obsessed with me flagged this YouTube as adult.
It is sexual discrimination as well as political and censorship limiting my audience and falsely misrepresenting me.
1) The YouTube talks about the media blacking out CityTime SAIC NYC Gov corruption as well as ECTP the 911 Tech System for the City of NY and Google allows an anonymous person to censor my video and age limit viewing.
2) I am not flat chested but if a flat chested woman made this video or a man wearing the same shirt and talking would she or he have been given an adult warning?
No.
3) Google allows men to go topless and not women so in NY State we have equal rights but not YouTube although I am not topless in any video ever filmed and posted on YouTube.
4) Google YouTube political freedom for some vs oppression and censorship of me -- from this YouTube, to my entire channel removed for 28 hours, Joe Tacopina 2 Baby Lisa's YouTube removed for 4 hours, 5 YouTube's of NYPD Mayor Mike Bloomberg's Security Intelligence Division -- 4 YouTubes with Det. Lynch violating NYPD Protocol and one with Lt. O'Sullivan violating my 1st amendment rights out on the street threatened with removal -- I endured two weeks of worry and fight on the NYPD videos and on all accounts except the adult rating Google did right by me except no apologies other than //// ///n's from Google YouTube's wrongful removal of my channel. Thank you for at least not wrongfully removing my NYPD videos. See "Glik v. Cunniffe" for legal right to film police in public streets where public become citizen journalists and re: 1st amendment right to speak out even when police are giving you orders "Houston v Hill".
YouTube is allowing Samuel Jackson, actor to post a "F" bomb riddled video filmed with an under age child, as well Chris Meloni Full Frontal Penis YouTube no adult warnings (see video link below) , shooting of the Times Square Murder by NYPD not adult warning, John Waters films -- no adult warnings but my political YouTube on media censorship gets an adult warning because of my breast size? Are you kidding me? I am fully dressed and I am petting my cat.
Activist Louis Flores described Google's actions towards me as "E-Burka" and it appears that Google YouTube continues to allow the system to empower anonymous attackers to censor me even if it is for 28 hours re: taking down my YouTube channel highly critical of mayor Mike Bloomberg trying to push through an illegal third term in an election that turned out to be to close to call so those 28 hours were important to me talking about censorship to news stories killed re: SAIC CityTime, ECTP 911 Tech corruption and Google gives me an adult rating doing the work of someone who wants to interfere with my work as a whistle blower and feminist.
It appears I am being consistently singled out and discriminated against unfairly and wrongly with the help of Google YouTube, Blogger and AdSense.
The Blogger Team can also confirm my entire blog was flagged way before my YouTube channel and the Blogger Team did confirm I had violated no terms.
Chris Meloni Full Frontal Penis Nudity Law & Order OZ HBO Law and Order
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T81wudjwplY
I am a political artist and feminist. When I use my breasts it is a statement about "the male gaze" and power grabs as relative to political power grabs, corporate, real estate and sheer sexism not a gratuitous post like /////// //////////////////s Paris Hilton Orgasm post.
Any use of my breasts is political parody although the line may be fine at times and believe my use of breasts expresses my outrage at how women are seen and not heard and often silenced as well as those acting in violence such as rape and even murder suggest the victim is to blame such as as in "honor killings" or by rapists and even defense attorneys.
I face censorship with the help of Google allowing anonymous people to flag me so please change your system and require at least those flagging our work for removal at least give their real name and contact info and if they actions are false please punish them by closing their accounts that should not be allowed to be sock puppet accounts. That would be one step in the right direction and discourage cowards that Google YouTube Blogger wrongfully empower.
To underscore my use of my breasts please see below my letters published in The Financial Times and The New York Times on Women's Issues from economic power, to sexual discrimination abuse and shame to make it clear to Google that AdSense's punishment of me by Abrahams "orgasm" post to Google YouTube's "E-Burka" is strongly felt my me.
June 4, 2000 The Financial Times published my first letter in response to William Packard's review of Lucian Freud's work and to the FT's credit at a time when The NY Times could not bring itself to use the word vagina the FT ran a full frontal image of Freud's painting of an older woman legs akimbo exposing her "flower power".
My letter is hard to find on the world wide web so I am including it along with my letter published in The Arts and Leisure Section of The New York Times on Women and the enjoyment of pornography.
"Image at the Cutting Edge" June 4, 2000
"William Packer's description of Lucian Freud's "Naked Portrait" ("Paint is back in fashion" May 16) and the courage of FT to show the image are truly spectacular.
Women's sexuality seems to be "hidden" in the most negative, shame based way as a form of control. When women's body parts are visually displayed it is usually to sell a product . The woman's body becomes "plastic", her "power" from being an object directly analogous to the product.
I am not a big Freud admirer but this painting and your courage in publishing it are at the cutting edge. As a woman painter I feel I would have more to lose than gain if I were to produce a self-portrait like "Naked Portrait" because women are still lagging behind on all fronts -- from economic power to the most basic human rights.
I would not expect The New York Times or The Wall Street Journal to carry an image like "Naked Portrait". Bravo Ft!
Suzannah B. Troy
WOMEN'S PORN; Come Up and See Us
To the Editor:
Re ''What Women Want to Watch'' by Susan Dominus [Aug. 29]:
Mae West for President!
In some cultures women are forced to cover their bodies from head to toe; in ours we are covered from head to toe in shame, guilt, fear and self-rejection.
For all the modernization and freedom we enjoy, Mae West still seems to be from the future. Until we can feel comfortable with our bodies -- and understand that they come in one size only: beautiful -- we will be impeded from enjoying our sexuality.
SUZANNAH B. TROY
New York
SUZANNAH B. TROY
New York
I have also received threats via comments on YouTube, had my identity stolen and comments posted on blogger on Queens Crap which I contacted you about as well and such comments as this which I interpret as a //// ///////. I had no idea when I created my blogger account how many years ago openly as Suzannah B. Troy that as sea of cowards all annoymous except for ////////////////// with the goal to shut me down.
It appears to be political and sexual discrimination and censorship with the goal to get me to be so fearful and or upset as to stop using Google YouTube, blogger and Adsense and to quit there by being silent as these annoymous cowards empowered by Google want and Google does empower than and repeatedly ////// /////. Even when restoring my work - the damage of immediate wrongful removal has not be undone.
Here is just one example:
Removed from this blog post......
xxx
In summary:
1) I want an apology and recognition from Google AdSense that Google AdSense acknowledges it was //////// ///////// that posted the Paris Hilton Orgasm post on his blog ///// ////// and not me.
AdSense could do more and perhaps Google needs to talk to their partners about these issues rather than punish me?
2) Google must change it's policy allowing political censorship -- immediate removal of my work and even my entire channel by an annoymous person /////// /// reporting my work like this is Communist Russia has got to stop.
I continue to ask Google to put me on a political protect list.
3) Stop the sexual discrimination and political discrimination and policies set in place to interfere and harm activists using Google.
Google rewards ////////// and punishes me. Why has Google YouTube has repeatedly turn down my requests for partnership. The wrong removal of my channel for 28 hours made subscribers think I had dumped them and damaged relations. Why did Google remove my entire channel without taking a look first.
4) Change your form reporting "hate". I receive a high volume of deeply Anti-Semitic/Racist and misogynist comments on behalf of Mel Gibson for my Mel Gibson is a Nazi YouTube and google makes me feel out a report moving through 30 YouTubes searching at a time I believe the goal of hoping I will be too tired to take the time to get to the video to report the hate.
Make hate crimes easier to report. Really shame how difficult you make hate crimes to report and Google used to add a step that asked "are you sure you want to report this?"
Are you kidding me?
5) I even wonder if the new Google Blogger Interface is yet another form of political interference as the "improvements" making it so much harder to blog and even visually see as the interface is almost pure white...visually hard on the eyes as well as on my Iphone 4S constantly flat lining when I try to post.
I continue to ask for political protection because my blogger account, YouTube Channel and now Adsense account have all come under attack.
There are grave concerns that my first amendment rights are being interfered with in various creative ways using Google to censor me and the AdSense attack is questionable and makes me wonder are certain Google staff working with critics that want to harm me by removing my work and or preventing me from earning money from AdSense similar to the Bloomberg fanatics removing my YouTube Channel.
I understand Google does not owe us a first amendment right but you will lose users if you violate first amendment rights.
Because of Google sexual discrimination I am looking to other options to continue my work where I do not have to live in fear of removal or punishment of earnings because Google discriminates against women -- the use of breasts and it is the 21st Century. I wish I was breast feeding twins when I reported the SAIC NYC Gov Bloomberg 911 Tech system video that got an adult warning from Google YouTube.
I look forward to a prompt response -- an apology re: AdSense the wrongful false attribution of /////// /////////'s Paris Hilton Orgasm post to me.
I alerted AdSense and Adsense ignored me as if I have no voice -- as if I am sub-human as if my words speaking the truth meant nothing.
If that not yet another form of sexual discrimination I don't know what is.
Thank you,
Suzannah B. Troy
p.s. I should have included this link!
