Heard on the street see below.......... and in my opinion Denault guilty but SAIC even guiltier but yes I think SAIC top officials and Bloomberg made a deal to give us only $455 million dollars back to brush way bigger corruption under the carpet.
"It seems security litigation is on the rise. How come with auditors, senior management, bank execs, sec + Sorbanes Oxley are STILL failing Every stop gap failed in the reporting of CITYTIME. How come? Could it be they were all in on it? The auditors Deloitte Auditors? Who's f....ng, job is that? Not a single POLITICIAN, top SAIC executive indicted, just a free pass to be monitored + 1/2 billion dollars. Also, 2003 is not the start date of CITYTIME...that's convenient. The biggest fraud of all time, why include the starting time, let's continue to not be thorough. Let's just scape goat Denault, who according to the street was praised and awarded continuously for great work, then canned for time sheet entry, please, do exempt managers fill out every hour, do not think so, lets get more refunds if that's the case. Calling all SAIC clients using SAIC on a gov con job and ask for you money back. SAIC admittedly in in their own words did not even have a time tracking system, yup a side splitting history, that seems to be ironic at best. Your suppose to be able to track time yourself first is the gist of this gobble goop.
Interesting...the following page was brought down http://www.deltek.com/pdf/customerstories/cs_qualityresearch.pdf ,
don't panic, believe we have hard copy on that. kind...play fair ball when bloggers are only publishing what others say to make light, yet point of a farce. So to re-blog this another way making the same point.
don't panic, believe we have hard copy on that. kind...play fair ball when bloggers are only publishing what others say to make light, yet point of a farce. So to re-blog this another way making the same point.
"CAE also contends that SAIC's proposal was unacceptable and should have been rejected because SAIC's accounting system had not been approved by DCAA as required by the RFP. Protester's Second Supp. Comments at 13. The protester states that, although DCAA had performed a limited scope survey in 2009 indicating that SAIC's accounting system was acceptable for award, SAIC subsequently and fundamentally changed its accounting system and that DCAA had not yet completed an ongoing audit. Protester's Comments at 16. " http://www.wifcon.com/pd16_3013.htm"
Note: From Suzannah ---- I heard on the street -- it is up to you to decide if it is true and false....
REDO and GO BACK IN TIME. We love our readers, we read too!!!
http://mayorbloombergkingofnewyork.blogspot.com/2012/08/citibank-lack-of-disclosure-like-saic.html
Oh and this video over 5,000 hits....
SAIC head financial guy Sopp email from SEC possible trouble ahead?
http://suzannahbtroy.blogspot.com/2012/08/httpwww_22.html
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?gl=US&hl=en-US&u=http://mayorbloombergkingofnewyork.blogspot.com/2011/06/what-did-saic-know-from-costs-to-tech.html&client=ms-rim&q=saic+deltek+pdf+time+troy+2011&sa=X&ei=Clw_UPKDJY2HqQGOjoDYDg&ved=0CB8QFjAC
http://mayorbloombergkingofnewyork.blogspot.com/2012/08/citibank-lack-of-disclosure-like-saic.html
Oh and this video over 5,000 hits....
SAIC head financial guy Sopp email from SEC possible trouble ahead?
http://suzannahbtroy.blogspot.com/2012/08/httpwww_22.html
http://www.google.com/gwt/x?gl=US&hl=en-US&u=http://mayorbloombergkingofnewyork.blogspot.com/2011/06/what-did-saic-know-from-costs-to-tech.html&client=ms-rim&q=saic+deltek+pdf+time+troy+2011&sa=X&ei=Clw_UPKDJY2HqQGOjoDYDg&ved=0CB8QFjAC
