Mike Bloomberg complained about "lawless partisan bloggers" to The New York Times. The Village Voice picked up the blogger story and now I just got a call that a friend watching MSNBC watched Bloomberg crying about bloggers yet again.
Bloomberg has bought off the media, controls the media, has great influence over the media -- you pick the words but he doesn't have control over the bloggers.
Bloomberg is a control freak.
The bloggers also do not have the same money manger that Mike Bloomberg has and I believe the owners of The New York Times and The New York Daily News have -- Steve Rattner! Steve Rattner who pleaded the 5th more times than king Mike has been mayor of New York and over the pension fund scandals.
What was Mike Bloomberg's money manager doing involved with NY's pensions any way? Isn't that a huge conflict of interest? Oh, that right, "The Conflict of Interest Comittee" doesn't think any thing is a conflict of interest from City Council voting themselves a raise when some even had lousy attendance records to denying us a referendum and voting themselves a third term.
Mike Bloomberg uber control freak can't control bloggers and he is really, really upset!!!!!!!
Is it because bloggers talk about how Haggerty is Bloomberg's Watergate! Follow the money trail!!!!!
Are king Mike's emails like off shore investments in the Caymen Islands, subpoena proof?
If Rattner is banned by the SEC does that mean Mike will have to shift all his money being handled by Rattner yet again including money in the Caymans? Rattner had him shift his money out of Quadrangle hoping Quadrangle would take the fall and not him but he was wrong...Quadrangle disavowed him and Rattner got busted. Rich people do not go to jail -- they pay multi-billion dollar fines. Rattner says he is innocent but than why plead the 5th over and over to the SEC. Why is the SEC moving slower than molasses on their ruling -- yes or no to ban Mike Bloomberg's best friend and money manager?
