See bottom of Blog to see info Unions, Wiki page, Vote Quinn OUT! etc.

See my YouTubes & Blog Postings on CityTime Corruption starting w/ May 27, 2010 Suzannah B. Troy's 1st YouTube on CityTime calling for NO renewal w/ SAIC and a full investigation!!! Reminder: Rudy gave us SAIC & CityTime (We didn’t need either-Mike ran with it Tax Payer’s Titanic)
Don't believe the news, New Yorkers are angry & will not vote for BLOOMBERG! Note: Mayor Bloomberg and his top deputies & key staff all took immunity in the Haggerty trial. Why? Mike Bloomberg broke campaign laws and committed perjury Haggerty Trial. Next the CityTime Trial with Team Bloomberg suffering amnesia yet again! Stay tuned! Vote for Christine Quinn if YOU want Mike to have a 4th term from the golf course! In front of SAIC NY offices demanding way more than 600 million $ back for The People of NYC !http://youtu.be/5MgD4ncQF18 Letter in Defense of Suzannah's YouTube Channel GoogleE-Burka by Louis Flores URGENT 911 Tech System ECTP Criminal Investigation Needed! http://mayorbloombergkingofnewyork.blogspot.com/2012/09/citytime-ectp-yell-down-mayor-bloomberg.html?m=1
Mike Yelled down Aug. 20 CityTime and ECTP 911 Tech

Sunday, February 28, 2016

YouTube Censorship -- My YouTubes Critical of mayor Mike Bloomberg removed for 28 hours before he barely won his illegal 3rd term

http://suzannahbtroy.blogspot.com/2009/09/how-youtube-banned-me-and-my-work-was.html

FYI the wikipedia page on me being censored was censored first cyber vandalized in a misogynist
attack and than deleted.....

but I am acknowledged on Wikipages on men -- Giuseppi Logan and NYPD Joe Sanchez and on a general page on censorship wiki I am still there.



https://www.coursehero.com/file/p2qkl8n/108-In-September-2009-the-account-of-artist-Suzannah-B-Troy-who-posted-videos   Page 7-8 censorship under mayor Mike Bloomberg my youtubes removed for 28 hours until I got them back....





sia with pressuring Youtube to do this. [111] In February 2007, Viacom sent upwards of 100,000 DMCA takedown notices to the video-sharing site YouTube . Of the 100,000, notices approximately 60–70 non-infringing videos were removed under the auspices of copyright infringement. [11] On March 13, 2007, Viacom filed a US$1 billion lawsuit against Google and YouTube alleging massive copyright infringement , alleging that users frequently uploaded copyrighted material to YouTube—enough to cause a hit in revenue for Viacom and a gain in advertisement revenue for YouTube. [12] The complaint contended that almost 160,000 unauthorized clips of Viacom’s programming were made available on YouTube and that these clips had collectively been viewed more than 1.5 billion times. However, the suit was seen by some as hypocritical. They claim that Viacom, through various programming on subsidiary channels, was infringing the rights of many Youtube users by uploading their videos without permission or compensation. In July 2008, the case generated controversy when District Judge Louis Stanton ruled that YouTube was required to hand over data detailing the viewing habits of every user who had ever watched videos on the site. [13] Judge Stanton rejected Viacom's request for YouTube to hand over the source code of its search engine system, saying that the code was a trade secret [14] Google and Viacom later agreed to allow Google to anonymize all the data before handing it over to Viacom. [15]
Background image of page 7